Factory evidence

Factory audits in China: scope the questions before the visit.

A useful factory audit is an evidence exercise against agreed criteria. It should distinguish the management system, the intended manufacturing process, the product route and any compliance scope instead of collapsing every question into a generic checklist.

Control premise

Decision question: what must be seen, tested and closed before this factory can be trusted with the proposed work?

Decision framework

Four audit lenses, four different answers

The right scope depends on what the project team needs to decide. A site visit can combine lenses, but each finding should remain linked to the criterion and evidence that produced it.

01

System audit

Tests whether the management system controls responsibilities, documents, records, calibration, training and improvement as intended.

Evidence route

Procedures, records, interviews and sampled transactions

02

Process audit

Follows the proposed manufacturing route through people, equipment, parameters, material flow, inspection and reaction plans.

Evidence route

Route observation, work instructions, parameter and control records

03

Product-route audit

Examines how a defined part or family would move from order review to release, including outside processes and traceability.

Evidence route

Drawing trail, traveller, inspection plan, sample records

04

Compliance-scope audit

Assesses a clearly named regulatory, ethical, environmental or customer requirement. Specialist scopes may require qualified independent auditors.

Evidence route

Scope-specific criteria, licences, records and objective evidence

Visible decision logic

An audit report must support a decision

Photos and narrative are not enough. Findings need severity, ownership, evidence and a verifiable closure route.

Report elementWhat good looks likeWeak substitute
CriterionRequirement or agreed benchmark stated before reviewAuditor preference introduced after the visit
EvidenceRecord, observation, interview and sample are traceableUncaptioned photo or unsupported assurance
FindingGap explains requirement, observed condition and riskGeneric red/amber/green label
SeverityClassification reflects project consequence and exposureEvery finding treated as equally important
Corrective actionOwner, due date, containment and root-cause actionPromise to improve without objective closure
DispositionApprove, conditionally approve, re-audit or rejectAudit filed without a recorded sourcing decision

What a factory audit cannot prove on its own

A prepared audit day may not reflect routine production behaviour.
Site capability does not prove the quoted route will use that capability.
An audit does not replace sample or first-article validation.
Closed findings require evidence; elapsed time alone is not closure.

Connected control cluster

Move from supplier confidence to recorded evidence.

Start with your requirement