Supplier approval

Supplier qualification in China, built around evidence—not listings.

PartVerity structures supplier approval around the actual drawing, process, material, volume and risk profile. A real factory can still be the wrong factory; qualification connects business identity to technical fit and a controlled first production decision.

Control premise

Decision question: is this supplier suitable for this part, this volume and this acceptance plan?

Decision framework

Six gates before supplier approval

The depth of each gate is scaled to part criticality, tooling exposure, order value and the consequence of a failed delivery. Approval is therefore project-specific rather than permanent or universal.

01

Identity and factory of record

Confirm the contracting party, operating location and the intended production site before technical assumptions harden into an order.

Evidence route

Business records, address evidence, factory-of-record declaration

02

Relevant process capability

Match equipment, materials, special processes and inspection capability to the actual geometry and characteristics on the controlled revision.

Evidence route

Equipment list, process route, material and metrology evidence

03

Quality-system behaviour

Review how revisions, calibration, traceability, non-conformance and corrective actions work in practice—not only whether a certificate exists.

Evidence route

Procedures, records, calibration status, example reports

04

Capacity and delivery fit

Check realistic loading, bottlenecks, planned shifts, outside processing and the difference between quoted and available capacity.

Evidence route

Capacity plan, subcontract map, milestone proposal

05

Technical validation

Use DFM closure, samples, first-off evidence or FAI where required to test the proposed route before repeat-production reliance.

Evidence route

Closed actions, sample disposition, dimensional evidence

06

Conditional approval and monitoring

Record what is approved, for which part family and under which controls. Reassess when process, location, ownership or performance materially changes.

Evidence route

Approval scope, open risks, review triggers, supplier scorecard

Visible decision logic

A scorecard that separates fit from confidence

One total percentage can hide a critical weakness. PartVerity keeps decision dimensions visible and records hold conditions separately.

DimensionEvidence reviewedTypical hold condition
TechnicalProcess route, equipment, material and feature capabilityCritical feature has no credible process or measurement route
QualityRevision, calibration, traceability and NCR recordsNo controlled response to non-conforming output
CapacityLoading, bottlenecks, staffing and outside processingQuoted schedule depends on undisclosed or unverified capacity
CommercialQuotation scope, exclusions, payment and tooling termsMaterial, inspection or ownership obligations remain ambiguous
DeliveryMilestones, packaging, export route and communicationNo accountable milestone owner or escalation route
GovernanceFactory of record, change notification and approval scopeSupplier can move work or change process without approval

Qualification is not a one-time badge

A certificate does not prove capability for a specific drawing.
A successful sample does not prove stable repeat production.
A legitimate company may still subcontract a critical operation.
An approved supplier still requires part-specific release criteria.

Connected control cluster

Move from supplier confidence to recorded evidence.

Start with your requirement